We are ALL apart of the SAME hypocrisy - Classified Ad
From the '100th Monkey cultural leap' files
Events and circumstances are the gestations of We, the people, in our mindset of consensus and accommodation to the status quo
We are a part of they hypocrisy we skeptically and cynically see beyond our self-flatterings
Thursday, January 15, 2015
Sunday, November 16, 2014
REDEEMER Mass CHRONICLES SEXUAL MASS COMMUNION CONFESSIONS -
To expect more YOU must BE more, and optimally so to a cathartic and orgiastic state of intensity for the literal and figurative inspirational experience for those insights
See more at: http://www.classifiedads.com/churches-ad143184419.htm#sthash.clyTA8Al.dpuf
Sunday, October 12, 2014
A RETRIBUTIVE HISTORICAL KARMA
Oh, how history works to synthesize the seemingly unrelated into a coherent tapestry of a message. Those who believed they were beyond integrity and could act with impunity are see the precipitate of their arrogance coming back to roost to lay the eggs of that cultural insemination at their feet
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ue-oXkd7-FM&feature=youtu.be
Monday, August 18, 2014
FERGUSON MO: THE UNFINISHED BUSINESS OF SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC INEQUITY AND INJUSTICE
FERGUSON MO: THE UNFINISHED BUSINESS
OF
SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC INEQUITY AND INJUSTICE
The system perpetuates the Ferguson MO and other outrages on minorities, lower-class, and working class people, since they have been disenfranchised economically, so they have no effectual voice politically to voice their civil rights for their own dignity and security as citizens.
-http://www.classifiedads.com/missed_connections-ad127832513.htm
Sunday, May 1, 2011
Proposed Constitutional Amendment
2 attachments (total 9.5 KB)
Download untitled-...2] (8.7 KB)
untitled-...2]
Download(8.7 KB)
View ~WRD000.jpg in slide show
Download
View slide show (1)
|
Download all as zip
The Beginnings of a New Constitutional Amendment
The 26th amendment (granting the right to vote for 18 year-olds) took only
3 months & 8 days to be ratified! Why? Simple! The people demanded it.
That was in 1971...before computers, before e-mail, before cell phones,
etc.
Of the 27 amendments to the Constitution, seven (7) took 1 year or less to
become the law of the land...all because of public pressure.
I'm asking each addressee to forward this email to a minimum of 12 people
on their address list; in turn ask each of those to do likewise.
In three days, most people in The United States of America will have the
message. This is one idea that really should be passed around.
Congressional Reform Act of 2011
1. Term Limits.
12 years only, one of the possible options below.
A. Two Six-year Senate terms
B. Six Two-year House terms
C. One Six-year Senate term and three Two-Year House terms
2. No Tenure / No Pension.
A Congressman collects a salary while in office and receives no pay
when they are out of office.
3. Congress (past, present & future) participates in Social Security.
All funds in the Congressional retirement fund move to the Social
Security system immediately. All future funds flow into the Social
Security system, and Congress participates with the American people.
4. Congress can purchase their own retirement plan, just as all
Americans do.
5. Congressional pay will rise by the lower of CPI or 3%.
6. Congress loses their current health care system and participates in the
same health care system as the American people.
7. Congress must equally abide by all laws they impose on the American
people.
8. All contracts with past and present Congressmen are void effective 1/1/12.
The American people did not make this contract with Congressmen.
Congressmen made all these contracts for themselves. Serving in
Congress is an honor, not a career. The Founding Fathers envisioned
citizen legislators, so ours should serve their term(s), then go home
and back to work.
If each person contacts a minimum of twenty people then it will only take
three days for most people (in the U.S.) to receive the message. Maybe it
is time.
THIS IS HOW YOU FIX CONGRESS!!!!! If you agree with the above, pass it on.
If not, just delete and I am sorry to waste your time.
You are one of my 20+. Please keep it going.
Regards,
Daniel L. Engelmann
Email: dengelma@comcast.net
Mobil: 219-794-4476
Download untitled-...2] (8.7 KB)
untitled-...2]
Download(8.7 KB)
View ~WRD000.jpg in slide show
Download
View slide show (1)
|
Download all as zip
The Beginnings of a New Constitutional Amendment
The 26th amendment (granting the right to vote for 18 year-olds) took only
3 months & 8 days to be ratified! Why? Simple! The people demanded it.
That was in 1971...before computers, before e-mail, before cell phones,
etc.
Of the 27 amendments to the Constitution, seven (7) took 1 year or less to
become the law of the land...all because of public pressure.
I'm asking each addressee to forward this email to a minimum of 12 people
on their address list; in turn ask each of those to do likewise.
In three days, most people in The United States of America will have the
message. This is one idea that really should be passed around.
Congressional Reform Act of 2011
1. Term Limits.
12 years only, one of the possible options below.
A. Two Six-year Senate terms
B. Six Two-year House terms
C. One Six-year Senate term and three Two-Year House terms
2. No Tenure / No Pension.
A Congressman collects a salary while in office and receives no pay
when they are out of office.
3. Congress (past, present & future) participates in Social Security.
All funds in the Congressional retirement fund move to the Social
Security system immediately. All future funds flow into the Social
Security system, and Congress participates with the American people.
4. Congress can purchase their own retirement plan, just as all
Americans do.
5. Congressional pay will rise by the lower of CPI or 3%.
6. Congress loses their current health care system and participates in the
same health care system as the American people.
7. Congress must equally abide by all laws they impose on the American
people.
8. All contracts with past and present Congressmen are void effective 1/1/12.
The American people did not make this contract with Congressmen.
Congressmen made all these contracts for themselves. Serving in
Congress is an honor, not a career. The Founding Fathers envisioned
citizen legislators, so ours should serve their term(s), then go home
and back to work.
If each person contacts a minimum of twenty people then it will only take
three days for most people (in the U.S.) to receive the message. Maybe it
is time.
THIS IS HOW YOU FIX CONGRESS!!!!! If you agree with the above, pass it on.
If not, just delete and I am sorry to waste your time.
You are one of my 20+. Please keep it going.
Regards,
Daniel L. Engelmann
Email: dengelma@comcast.net
Mobil: 219-794-4476
Monday, January 3, 2011
The indictment of the vernacular
That Crazy Lady commented: ' It's not the fault of language itself though. It's more related to introspection and critical thinking.'
Yes, but the USE, aka the vernacular interpretation, I indict as the culprit. The interpretation becomes the tool of (mindless to submissive) thought and that thought's linguistic syntax. The words and terms we choose for use as our thoughts affect not only our spoken communications, but our subconscious command imperatives, which are the triggers for our more powerful emotional predispositions. The 'Book of St. John' made a great point by opening with the verse, "In the beginning was the word". Words determine what and HOW we think. Just like a contaminated, corrupted, or infected media culture; or as the maxim for computer programming states, 'Junk in, junk out'. The highly influential commercial, as well as social mores and traditions 'program' the boundary forms and limits of the interpretation. 'American Exceptionalism', 'Manifest Destiny', 'special relationship'-all a part of the 'big lie' which Orwell, Huxley wrote about and the Nazis showed its political and cultural application. Compound these big lies with the little fallacies of authority, status, and title abuse in personal relations, let alone institutional and secular settings, and there you have a population with a contaminated and corrupted language base that they mindlessly to gluttonously consume to the communication indolencies and morbidities of thought and (lack of) expression (and introspection) we have both noted.
Yes, but the USE, aka the vernacular interpretation, I indict as the culprit. The interpretation becomes the tool of (mindless to submissive) thought and that thought's linguistic syntax. The words and terms we choose for use as our thoughts affect not only our spoken communications, but our subconscious command imperatives, which are the triggers for our more powerful emotional predispositions. The 'Book of St. John' made a great point by opening with the verse, "In the beginning was the word". Words determine what and HOW we think. Just like a contaminated, corrupted, or infected media culture; or as the maxim for computer programming states, 'Junk in, junk out'. The highly influential commercial, as well as social mores and traditions 'program' the boundary forms and limits of the interpretation. 'American Exceptionalism', 'Manifest Destiny', 'special relationship'-all a part of the 'big lie' which Orwell, Huxley wrote about and the Nazis showed its political and cultural application. Compound these big lies with the little fallacies of authority, status, and title abuse in personal relations, let alone institutional and secular settings, and there you have a population with a contaminated and corrupted language base that they mindlessly to gluttonously consume to the communication indolencies and morbidities of thought and (lack of) expression (and introspection) we have both noted.
Wednesday, December 29, 2010
Philosophy of Engineering
The Philosophy of Engineering
Since there is such a dearth on the subject, this ultimate layman is going to jump right into the middle of the void and set my 'Kilroy was here'-marker down.
I see the philosophy of engineering as the consideration on the use of resources, designs, materials and their application affects. It's not about the fabrication of the widget, it's the use of the widget beyond it original intent. Should the widget be considered for fabrication because it is metaphysically feasible? In the design and fabrication, the less esoteric discussion of what efficiencies of elegance are utilized at arriving at the 'final' form. Unlike many philosophical questions that have a 'many path' resolutions, for the fabrication of a concept, even, is there not a degree of logical elegance in the formation of a concept?
I would assert that the philosophy of engineering would be an extension of the discipline of thought. How we use time to prioritize the movement of our attention for our kinetic movements (of action). Even, our recreational and passive awareness of stimuli in our sensory field could be subject to a discipline. Though I would advocate that 'vegging' in sleep or meditation would be the preferred re-creational use of 'passive' awareness. Vegging, I'd define as the non-intentional awareness of things for which we have no utilitarian plans. Passive awareness would be the act of non-intentional awareness. This connects to the discipline of thought and the philosophy of engineering as the subconscious operations of the disciplines of thought. The inspirations of 'satori', aka insight or inspiration, come from this reservoir of disengaged intentional attention. The inspirations become the mental jig-saw puzzle pieces from which we use the disciplines of thought to construct elegant logic threads for our kinetic movements of whatever fabrication.
By submitting to this process of vegging to satori to inspiration to associative coupling for tactical and strategic logic plans for our movements we create an individual predisposition for the type of engineering we'd be employing. That engineering would be organically connected and not some abstract, alien imposition on the nature processes.
Why would I make this assertive leap? Because many of the 'tools' we employ are designed to deconstruct not only the environmental natural order, but our direct, physical, exertional experience in the natural order; the tools become the substitute and surrogate for our own tangible, tactile interaction in the natural order. As we begin to diligently be conscious of the way we prioritize and organize our physical movements in our triaging to get things done, we our thinking will organically conform to assist those intentions. That thinking will seek out the facilitating forms in its field of awareness to be more organically efficient in supplying us with the more congruent 'stimuli' of choices. The result of these mental habits of attentive organization will direct your predispositions and preferences to those forms that best support the rigor of your efforts. As we seek the more elegant physical efficiencies for our direct intentional attention and their physical, kinetic intents, our aesthetic preferences will conform to our operational mental organization. What we fabricate will be from the metaphysical fetus of that mental habit of focus.
Philosophy of engineering is the offspring of the architecture of thought. That architecture of thought is the process of attentiveness to elegant efficiencies in tactile, tactical, and strategic movements of our sensory and physical apparatus-the ultimate tool!
Since there is such a dearth on the subject, this ultimate layman is going to jump right into the middle of the void and set my 'Kilroy was here'-marker down.
I see the philosophy of engineering as the consideration on the use of resources, designs, materials and their application affects. It's not about the fabrication of the widget, it's the use of the widget beyond it original intent. Should the widget be considered for fabrication because it is metaphysically feasible? In the design and fabrication, the less esoteric discussion of what efficiencies of elegance are utilized at arriving at the 'final' form. Unlike many philosophical questions that have a 'many path' resolutions, for the fabrication of a concept, even, is there not a degree of logical elegance in the formation of a concept?
I would assert that the philosophy of engineering would be an extension of the discipline of thought. How we use time to prioritize the movement of our attention for our kinetic movements (of action). Even, our recreational and passive awareness of stimuli in our sensory field could be subject to a discipline. Though I would advocate that 'vegging' in sleep or meditation would be the preferred re-creational use of 'passive' awareness. Vegging, I'd define as the non-intentional awareness of things for which we have no utilitarian plans. Passive awareness would be the act of non-intentional awareness. This connects to the discipline of thought and the philosophy of engineering as the subconscious operations of the disciplines of thought. The inspirations of 'satori', aka insight or inspiration, come from this reservoir of disengaged intentional attention. The inspirations become the mental jig-saw puzzle pieces from which we use the disciplines of thought to construct elegant logic threads for our kinetic movements of whatever fabrication.
By submitting to this process of vegging to satori to inspiration to associative coupling for tactical and strategic logic plans for our movements we create an individual predisposition for the type of engineering we'd be employing. That engineering would be organically connected and not some abstract, alien imposition on the nature processes.
Why would I make this assertive leap? Because many of the 'tools' we employ are designed to deconstruct not only the environmental natural order, but our direct, physical, exertional experience in the natural order; the tools become the substitute and surrogate for our own tangible, tactile interaction in the natural order. As we begin to diligently be conscious of the way we prioritize and organize our physical movements in our triaging to get things done, we our thinking will organically conform to assist those intentions. That thinking will seek out the facilitating forms in its field of awareness to be more organically efficient in supplying us with the more congruent 'stimuli' of choices. The result of these mental habits of attentive organization will direct your predispositions and preferences to those forms that best support the rigor of your efforts. As we seek the more elegant physical efficiencies for our direct intentional attention and their physical, kinetic intents, our aesthetic preferences will conform to our operational mental organization. What we fabricate will be from the metaphysical fetus of that mental habit of focus.
Philosophy of engineering is the offspring of the architecture of thought. That architecture of thought is the process of attentiveness to elegant efficiencies in tactile, tactical, and strategic movements of our sensory and physical apparatus-the ultimate tool!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
