Economic/Political 'Yin/Yang'-Critique of Establishment NWO/TRUMPIAN Dogma
Trumpian, aka neo-Libertarian, dogma relies too much on the economic forces being the leveraging determiner of the politics [See the economic analysis of Michael Lind (2012)]. This view disregards the emotional energy of the humanistic ethos of individuals and their collectives. Equally flawed is the Neo-liberal NWO that relies on a political framework in which a preferred economic system exists [The fatal flaw of neoliberalism: it's bad economics by Dani Rodrik (2017)]. This also discounts the provincial and individualistic aspirations of the contrarian niches.
Governance is more the Yin of collective composition of economic arrangements-for their own sake, sorted for a manageable cohesive social order.
Since the populist dynamics is more an intangible virtue, plus rare and anecdotal social-pathological militant actions by comparative small collectives, they are disregarded until they reach a threatening critical mass of asymmetric action against the authorities in-charge. Even the present-day Trumpists with their political State-rights leverage and martial gun-culture comprise by some estimates less than 25% of the populace. The cohesiveness of that 25% makes them formidable, but not overwhelming without another 15-20% who favor any sort of order for their cultural "well-being".
It's for that extra marginal percentage of people to obtain the political will for either of the competing claims that gives politics its venue of importance. For the unorganized 40% of the remaining 55% only their narrative interpretation of 'in the course of [cultural] events works as the obstruction to the aspirations of the Neo-libertarian/Trumpists and the Neo-liberal/NWO-ist.
---------------Your "2-cents"----------------------
If favorably disposed with these thoughts, a literal $0.02-USD patronage can be made the this PayPal-QR proxy link
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FUW0AoZWYAEwZ4u?format=jpg&name=medium
