Economic/Political 'Yin/Yang'-Critique of Establishment NWO/TRUMPIAN Dogma

 

Economic/Political 'Yin/Yang'-Critique of Establishment NWO/TRUMPIAN Dogma

Trumpian, aka neo-Libertarian, dogma relies too much on the economic forces being the leveraging determiner of the politics [See the economic analysis of Michael Lind (2012)]. This view disregards the emotional energy of the humanistic ethos of individuals and their collectives. Equally flawed is the Neo-liberal NWO that relies on a political framework in which a preferred economic system exists [The fatal flaw of neoliberalism: it's bad economics by Dani Rodrik (2017)]. This also discounts the provincial and individualistic aspirations of the contrarian niches.

Governance is more the Yin of collective composition of economic arrangements-for their own sake, sorted for a manageable cohesive social order. 

Both the Neo-libertarian (Trumpian) and Neo-liberal (NWO-Establishment) dynamics infringe on the integrity of the individual for either economic or political expedience.  Because of these infringements the Right and Left extremes are the inherent, consequential and balancing dynamics when the societal order becomes ossified in its non-responsiveness to those L/R-populist objections.

Both the Neo-libertarian (Trumpian) and Neo-liberal (NWO-Establishment) dynamics infringe on the integrity of the individual for either economic or political expedience.  Because of these infringements the Right and Left extremes are the inherent balancing dynamics when the societal order becomes ossified in its non-responsiveness to those L/R-populist objections.

Since the populist dynamics is more an intangible virtue, plus rare and anecdotal social-pathological militant actions by comparative small collectives, they are disregarded until they reach a threatening critical mass of asymmetric action against the authorities in-charge. Even the present-day Trumpists with their political State-rights leverage and martial gun-culture comprise by some estimates less than 25% of the populace. The cohesiveness of that 25% makes them formidable, but not overwhelming without another 15-20% who favor any sort of order for their cultural "well-being".

It's for that extra marginal percentage of people to obtain the political will for either of the competing claims that gives politics its venue of importance. For the unorganized 40% of the remaining 55% only their narrative interpretation of 'in the course of [cultural] events works as the obstruction to the aspirations of the Neo-libertarian/Trumpists and the Neo-liberal/NWO-ist. 

---------------Your "2-cents"----------------------

If favorably disposed with these thoughts, a literal $0.02-USD patronage can be made the this PayPal-QR proxy link

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FUW0AoZWYAEwZ4u?format=jpg&name=medium

 

WHY the Revolution WON'T BE Televised

 

WHY the Revolution WON'T BE Televised 

Mainstream media from the internet to cable TV is 

similar to how the Scriptures described  the venues 

of their time:

Matthew 23:2-10 KJV:  2 Saying The scribes and the 

Pharisees sit in Moses' seat: 3 All therefore whatsoever 

they bid you observe, that observe and do; but do not 

ye after their works: for they say, and do not.  4 For they 

bind heavy burdens and grievous to be borne, and lay 

them on men's shoulders; but they themselves will not 

move them with one of their fingers.  5 But all their works 

they do for to be seen of men: they make broad their 

phylacteries, and enlarge the borders of their garments,  

 6And love the uppermost rooms at feasts, and the chief 

seats in the synagogues,  7 And greetings in the markets, 

and to be called of men, Rabbi, Rabbi. 8 But be not ye 

called Rabbi: for one is your Master, even Christ; and 

all ye are brethren.  9 And call no man your father upon 

the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven.  

 10 Neither be ye called masters…

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

Let  them preen and posture in the public, because 

the work of 'the revolution' will be done as a personal 

gesture of goodwill between a recognition of common 

 conditions and aspirational interest. We will need only 

that personal connection and not any public recognition, 

fame or reknown.

It will be the a recognition of a serious mindset and its 

way of disciplined thinking. The logic of thought will be

 the imperative for their synergistic and symbiotic 

inspiration and resolve for their collaboration and 

cooperation. That mindset will eschew and purge the 

frivolities of whim and indulgence, which will separate 

and segregate them from the distractive actions of the 

less disciplined and indulgent others. The drama of 

ad hominem bias is replaced by the expedient of 

necessity and functionality. Their means is the 

definer of their ends. Their systemic operation is 

the organic pronouncement and announcement 

of the substance of that reality.